<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		
		<title>EARTO News</title>
		<link>http://www.earto.eu/</link>
		<description>Latest news from EARTO and Europe</description>
		<language>en</language>
		
		<generator>TYPO3 - get.content.right</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
		
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:27:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Council Misses the Opportunity to Clarify the SME Specific Instrument</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/council-misses-the-opportunity-to-clarify-the-sme-specific-instrument.html</link>
			<description>On 20th February 2012 the Competitiveness Council held a public debate on Horizon 2020, preceded by a presentation from the Commission. There were three main topics for discussion: International Cooperation, Social Sciences and Humanities and the participation of SMEs in Horizon 2020. The Ministers pointed out the importance of a strong external dimension in all parts of Horizon 2020, as well as the great importance attached to Social Sciences and Humanities. In this respect, however, there were different points of views between the countries that want to keep it embedded in all the Societal...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On 20th February 2012 the Competitiveness Council held a public debate on Horizon 2020, preceded by a presentation from the Commission. There were three main topics for discussion: International Cooperation, Social Sciences and Humanities and the participation of SMEs in Horizon 2020. The Ministers pointed out the importance of a strong external dimension in all parts of Horizon 2020, as well as the great importance attached to Social Sciences and Humanities. In this respect, however, there were different points of views between the countries that want to keep it embedded in all the Societal Challenges, those that are asking for a separate challenge, and those who claim for a programme for the different cross-cutting aspects.<br />Regarding SMEs in Horizon 2020, there was a strong support from the Council regarding the measures to boost participation of SMEs in Horizon 2020, and some countries suggested increasing the current 15% target. Some countries also expressed their position in favour of the continuation of the Eurostars Programme. However, the Ministers missed the opportunity to ask for a further clarification on how the SME Specific Instrument will be implemented or how much funding from the different Societal Challenges will be earmarked to it.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:27:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Flanders recommends the Commission to reinstate the full-cost option </title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/flanders-recommends-the-commission-to-reinstate-the-full-cost-option.html</link>
			<description>The Flemish Council for Science and Innovation (VRWI) has recently published a position paper in which they support the full-cost option for non-profit organizations that are able to calculate their real indirect costs, warning that the proposed 20% flat rate “evaporates” the attractiveness of Horizon 2020 for institutions with expensive infrastructure. VRWI also asks for an increase in the budget for Marie Curie and cautions against the introduction of a ‘Europe first’ rule in the IP section. Flanders also requests the Commission to propose measures to improve participation of participants...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Flemish Council for Science and Innovation (VRWI) has recently published a position paper in which they support the full-cost option for non-profit organizations that are able to calculate their real indirect costs, warning that the proposed 20% flat rate “evaporates” the attractiveness of Horizon 2020 for institutions with expensive infrastructure. VRWI also asks for an increase in the budget for Marie Curie and cautions against the introduction of a ‘Europe first’ rule in the IP section. Flanders also requests the Commission to propose measures to improve participation of participants from smaller countries or regions in JPIs.
The three Belgian regions&nbsp;(Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels) have the competencies in Research and Innovation policies. Therefore, the Flemish position will be taken into account when drafting the Belgian official position on Horizon 2020, to be published in the coming weeks.
<link http://www.vrwi.be/pdf/advies164.pdf - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:21:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Research Clearing Committee active since January 2012</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/research-clearing-committee-active-since-january-2012.html</link>
			<description>According to the Commission, the Research Clearing Committee - responsible for ensuring a uniform interpretation of research-related rules among the different Commission services - is set up and running since January 2012 . 
EU research funding beneficiaries can consult the Clearing Committee on any legal, financial and management matter for which there is no common position among the Commission's services. Beneficiaries are informed that questions are filtered before reaching the Committee, and therefore not all requests can be dealt with. 
Composed of the Directorates-General and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to the Commission, the <link fileadmin/content/RCC_ppt.ppt - download "Initiates file download">Research Clearing Committee</link> - responsible for ensuring a uniform interpretation of research-related rules among the different Commission services - is set up and running since January 2012 . 
EU research funding beneficiaries can consult the Clearing Committee on any legal, financial and management matter for which there is no common position among the Commission's services. Beneficiaries are informed that questions are filtered before reaching the Committee, and therefore not all requests can be dealt with. 
Composed of the Directorates-General and Executive agencies, the Committee can be contacted via the EUROPA website.
<link http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?lg=fr&pg=enquiries - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:04:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Competitiveness Council to discuss International Cooperation and SMEs on Horizon 2020</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/competitiveness-council-to-discuss-international-cooperation-and-smes-on-horizon-2020.html</link>
			<description>On February 20th to 21st will take place the first formal Competitiveness Council meeting of the Danish Presidency. On Tuesday there will be a public debate on Horizon 2020 and the EIT that can be followed live at the Council’s website. Although all the Horizon 2020 proposals are on the table, the main issues to be discussed are International Cooperation and the role of SMEs in Horizon 2020, being the last one the hot topic on the agenda as the different measures are unclear and confusing. 
Other issues interesting for EARTO are the exchange of views on the future of the GMES, the bioeconomy...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 20th to 21st will take place the first formal Competitiveness Council meeting of the Danish Presidency. On Tuesday there will be a public debate on Horizon 2020 and the EIT that can be followed live at the Council’s <link http://video.consilium.europa.eu/default.aspx - external-link>website</link>. Although all the Horizon 2020 proposals are on the table, the main issues to be discussed are International Cooperation and the role of SMEs in Horizon 2020, being the last one the hot topic on the agenda as the different measures are unclear and confusing. 
Other issues interesting for EARTO are the exchange of views on the future of the GMES, the bioeconomy action plan, the public consultation on the ERA Framework and the Patent package. 
<link http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/st06/st06208.en12.pdf - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Maria da Graça Carvalho Also Appointed Rapporteur for H2020 </title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/maria-da-graca-carvalho-also-appointed-rapporteur-for-h2020.html</link>
			<description>Portuguese MEP Maria da Graça Carvalho has been appointed rapporteur for the Specific Programme Implementing Horizon 2020. She will respond to the text presented by the Commission on 30 November 2011 and will be charged with &quot;defining the modes of interaction and the details&quot; of the three priorities outlined in Horizon 2020. These are: Scientific Excellence, the creation of Industry Leadership and responses to Societal Challenges. 
While the Regulation establishing Horizon 2020 defines the general objective, the Specific Programme Implementing Horizon 2020 concerns specific...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Portuguese MEP Maria da Graça Carvalho has been appointed rapporteur for the Specific Programme Implementing Horizon 2020. She will respond to the text presented by the Commission on 30 November 2011 and will be charged with &quot;defining the modes of interaction and the details&quot; of the three priorities outlined in Horizon 2020. These are: Scientific Excellence, the creation of Industry Leadership and responses to Societal Challenges. 
While the Regulation establishing Horizon 2020 defines the general objective, the Specific Programme Implementing Horizon 2020 concerns specific objectives and further definition of the broad priorities covered by the three pillars. 
<link http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/index_en.cfm - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:58:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Austria presents its position on Horizon 2020</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/austria-presents-its-position-on-horizon-2020.html</link>
			<description>On February 14th the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research published its position paper on the Horizon 2020 proposals. Austria welcomes the proposed general structure of Horizon 2020, but criticizes some of the concrete proposals:
• Rejects the increased co-funding of national mobility programmes through Marie Curie• Asks for clarification on the future FET Flagships and on the Risk Financing instruments;• Demands the reintroduction of the Research for the Benefit of SMEs scheme;• Criticizes the structure of the “Inclusive, Innovative and Secure Societies” Challenge,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="region region-content"><div id="block-system-main" class="block block-system collapsiblock-processed"><div class="content"><div id="node-3566" class="node node-news clearfix"><div class="content"><div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><span style="FONT-SIZE: small">On February 14th the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research published its position paper on the Horizon 2020 proposals. Austria welcomes the proposed general structure of Horizon 2020, but criticizes some of the concrete proposals:</span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: small">•&nbsp;Rejects the increased co-funding of national mobility programmes through Marie Curie<br />•&nbsp;Asks for clarification on the future FET Flagships and on the Risk Financing instruments;<br />•&nbsp;Demands the reintroduction of the Research for the Benefit of SMEs scheme;<br />•&nbsp;Criticizes the structure of the “Inclusive, Innovative and Secure Societies” Challenge, and proposes separate challenges for Security and for Social Sciences;<br />•&nbsp;Asks for a better structure in the Health Challenge and for the maintenance of the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme (CIP) outside Horizon 2020;</span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: small">Regarding the Rules for Participation, Austria welcomes the 100% funding rate, but requests to keep an option for non-profit organisations to claim actual indirect costs (although it does not specify at which rate). In respect to the budget, Austria warns that the amount allocated to Horizon 2020 could be reduced, and already proposes a reallocation of the funds from the Societal Challenges to the Industrial Leadership block and, to a lesser extent, the Excellent Science pillar.</span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: small"><link http://www.era.gv.at/space/11442/directory/26162/doc/26159.html - external-link>Link</link></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:08:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>EC Presents List of Simplification Measures to MFF</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/ec-presents-list-of-simplification-measures-to-mff.html</link>
			<description>The European Commission has presented a Communication gathering all simplification measures it wishes to apply to the future EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). 
In the area of research, the simplification measures listed in the Communication are open for negotiation in the framework of the Horizon 2020 legislative process and the Financial Regulation. Some of the measures were welcomed by beneficiaries such as the acceptance of usual accounting practices, the possibility for unrecoverable VAT to become an eligible cost and the reduction of auditing burden. However, measures such...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The European Commission has presented a Communication gathering all simplification measures it wishes to apply to the future EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). 
In the area of research, the simplification measures listed in the Communication are open for negotiation in the framework of the Horizon 2020 legislative process and the Financial Regulation. Some of the measures were welcomed by beneficiaries such as the acceptance of&nbsp;usual accounting practices, the possibility for unrecoverable VAT to become an eligible cost and the reduction of auditing burden. However, measures such as the use a unique 20% flat rate for the reimbursement of indirect costs are seen as rather harmful by EARTO members. 
The Commission has called on the European Parliament and Council to support the measures and once the measures have been adopted, it plans to regularly monitor the progress through a dedicated Simplification Scoreboard. 
<link http://ec.europa.eu/budget/biblio/documents/fin_fwk1420/fin_fwk1420_en.cfm#simplification - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>EC Proposes Strategy to Build Bioeconomy in Europe</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/commission-proposes-a-strategy-to-build-the-bioeconomy-in-europe.html</link>
			<description>On February 22nd the European Commission presented its strategy for reinforcing the bioeconomy in Europe, a sector that employs already 22 million people in the EU. Research and Innovation is the backbone of the Strategy, together with market uptake measures and coordination of national policies. However, no more money for Research and Development is provided in the Strategy. 
The Commission merely recalls that apart from the €4.6bn allocated to the Food and Bioeconomy Challenge, more money will be spent on bioeconomy research coming from other Challenges such as Climate Action,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 22nd the European Commission presented its strategy for reinforcing the bioeconomy in Europe, a sector that employs already 22 million people in the EU. Research and Innovation is the backbone of the Strategy, together with market uptake measures and coordination of national policies. However, no more money for Research and Development is provided in the Strategy. 
The Commission merely recalls that apart from the €4.6bn allocated to the Food and Bioeconomy Challenge, more money will&nbsp;be spent on bioeconomy research&nbsp;coming from other Challenges such as Climate Action, Energy and Health, as well as from the Industrial Technologies priorities (biotechnology, nanotechnology and ICT). It is also mentioned other initiatives such as future EIPs on Agriculture and Raw Materials, the KIC ‘Food4Future’ –to be set up in 2014- and the ‘Seas and Oceans’ JPI, already launched. The most relevant announcement is that the Commission is considering to set up a PPP for bio-based industries, which shows that PPPs and JTIs are expected to play a greater role in Horizon 2020 than in FP7.
<link http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/press/press_packages/index_en.htm - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>EC Publishes “Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011”</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/ec-publishes-innovation-union-scoreboard-2011.html</link>
			<description>On February 7th the European Commission has presented the “Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011” (IUS). The report compares the innovation performance of the EU member states and associated members amongst themselves and with 10 global competitors. 
The IUS 2011 shows that the EU27´s innovation performance has improved over the years but that countries such as Japan, Switzerland, South Korea and the United States lie ahead. According to the study Brazil, China and India are behind the European Union but the gap is shrinking continuously. 
The report also acknowledges that current impacts cannot...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 7th the European Commission has presented the “Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011” (IUS). The report compares the innovation performance of the EU member states and associated members amongst themselves and with 10 global competitors. 
The IUS 2011 shows that the EU27´s innovation performance has improved over the years but that countries such as Japan, Switzerland, South Korea and the United States lie ahead. According to the study Brazil, China and India are behind the European Union but the gap is shrinking continuously. 
The report also acknowledges that current impacts cannot be fully captured because of limited data. 
<link http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2011_en.pdf - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:48:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>JPND Launches its Research Strategy</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/jpnd-jpi-research-strategy-is-ready.html</link>
			<description>On February 7th the Joint Programming Initiative on Neurodegenerative Disease Research launched the first ever European-wide research strategy in the field. 
This common Research Strategy will guide research activity and investments in the field of neurodegenerative diseases over the coming decade in Europe. The goals of the European-wide strategy include developing new treatments and preventive strategies, improving health and social care approaches, and raising awareness about neurodegenerative diseases.
Identified JPND priorities will be addressed through a range of long-term,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 7th the Joint Programming Initiative on Neurodegenerative Disease Research launched the first ever European-wide research strategy in the field. 
This common Research Strategy will guide research activity and investments in the field of neurodegenerative diseases over the coming decade in Europe.&nbsp;The goals of the European-wide strategy include developing new treatments and preventive strategies, improving health and social care approaches, and raising awareness about neurodegenerative diseases.
Identified JPND priorities will be addressed&nbsp;through a range of long-term, medium-to-large-scale initiatives, which are planned to emerge during 2012. 
<link http://www.neurodegenerationresearch.eu/initiatives/strategic-research-agenda/ - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:28:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>FACCE JPI Launches Public Consultation </title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/facce-jpi-launches-public-consultation.html</link>
			<description>On January 26th the Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change Joint Programming Initiative opened a public consultation to collect stakeholders’ views on the key priorities areas for research. 
The FACCE – JPI Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) has elaborated a Scientific Research Agenda, detailing the scope, core research themes and the priority actions. Following the publication of the Scientific Research Agenda, themes are elaborated in dedicated meetings to provide further input towards the development of the Strategic Research Agenda. 
The public stakeholder consultation...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On January 26th&nbsp;the Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change Joint Programming Initiative opened a public consultation to collect stakeholders’ views on the key priorities&nbsp;areas for research. 
The FACCE – JPI Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) has elaborated a Scientific Research Agenda, detailing the scope, core research themes and the priority actions. Following the publication of the Scientific Research Agenda, themes are elaborated in dedicated meetings to provide further input towards the development of the Strategic Research Agenda. 
The public stakeholder consultation will aim to reinforce the SAB analysis of the key issues to be addressed as well as to gather views on their importance: goals, core research themes and priority actions, and implementation. 
A summary of the results of the consultation will be published on the FACCE – JPI website and will contribute to the Strategic Research Agenda to be published still in 2012. 
<link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dEhLUXpUbXdpUmFXYXp5SkNNR1dNeXc6MQ - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Nature Interviews One of the Rapporteurs for Horizon 2020</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/nature-interviews-one-of-the-rapporteurs-for-horizon-2020.html</link>
			<description>On February 3rd Nature magazine interviewed MEP Teresa Riera Madurell, recently appointed rapporteur for the establishing regulation of Horizon 2020. The former computer scientist and five other parliamentary rapporteurs will draft the legislative documents that will dictate the structure of Horizon 2020 and related European research initiatives. 
During the interview, Ms. Riera shared the opinion that the €80 billion budget proposed by the Commission is insufficient taking in consideration Horizon 2020’s focus on tackling societal challenges and creating jobs. On simplification, the MEP...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 3rd Nature magazine interviewed MEP Teresa Riera Madurell, recently appointed rapporteur for the establishing regulation of Horizon 2020. The former computer scientist and five other parliamentary rapporteurs will draft the legislative documents that will dictate the structure of Horizon 2020 and related European research initiatives. 
During the interview, Ms. Riera shared the opinion that the €80 billion budget proposed by the Commission is insufficient taking in consideration Horizon 2020’s focus on tackling societal challenges and creating jobs. On simplification, the MEP explained she would “push hard” for measures to be taken. Other topics that deserve priority according to the rapporteur include excellence, cohesion, support to “investigators that have potential” and the European Research Area. 
Ms. Riera’s report on Horizon 2020 is planned for adoption in November 2012.
<link http://www.nature.com/news/europe-s-research-plan-starts-to-take-shape-1.9973 - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:19:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Some Member States Consider Alternative Funding Models for Horizon 2020</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/some-member-states-propose-different-funding-models-for-horizon-2020.html</link>
			<description>According to Neth-er, the Netherlands RTD Liaison Office in Brussels, some Member States have already raised their doubts about the funding model proposed by the Commission for Horizon 2020. Although the in-depth discussion in the Council about the Rules for Participation has been postponed until the Cypriot Presidency, some Member States already advanced their positions in the Competitiveness Council of December and on the Q&amp;A session of the Research Working Group in early January.
According to this information, countries such as Belgium and Finland asked to increase the flat rate for...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to Neth-er, the Netherlands RTD Liaison Office in Brussels, some Member States have already raised their doubts about the funding model proposed by the Commission for Horizon 2020. Although the in-depth discussion in the Council about the Rules for Participation has been postponed until the Cypriot Presidency, some Member States already advanced their positions in the Competitiveness Council of December and on the Q&amp;A session of the Research Working Group in early January.
According to this information, countries such as Belgium and Finland asked to increase the flat rate for indirect costs up to 30%, while others such as France or Denmark would prefer to maintain the proposed 20% flat rate. Other countries such as Sweden, Norway and Slovenia support the Dutch position in favour of keeping the option for non-profit organisations to claim the reimbursement of real indirect costs. This is the option supported by EARTO, who has proposed a 75%-75% model that would maintain the funding rates at the level of FP7. 
<link http://www.neth-er.eu/nl/nieuws/horizon-2020-kan-europa-op-%C3%A9%C3%A9n-lijn-komen - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:21:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>EU Ministers Start Detailed Discussions on Horizon 2020</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/ministers-start-detailed-discussions-on-horizon-2020.html</link>
			<description>The Research Ministers of the 27, meeting at an Informal Competitiveness Council in Copenhagen, have discussed thoroughly the proposals on Horizon 2020 after the first exchange of views held in February. The first day was devoted to dialogue with stakeholders, who expressed their ‘critical review’ of the proposals, analyzing the three blocks one by one. Today, Ministers discussed in parallel sessions different issues such as simplification, synergies with Structural Funds and How to transform Research results into Innovation.
In a press briefing after the meeting the Danish Minister...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Research Ministers of the 27, meeting at an Informal Competitiveness Council in Copenhagen, have discussed thoroughly the proposals on Horizon 2020 after the first exchange of views held in February. The first day was devoted to dialogue with stakeholders, who expressed their ‘critical review’ of the proposals, analyzing the three blocks one by one. Today, Ministers discussed in parallel sessions different issues such as simplification, synergies with Structural Funds and How to transform Research results into Innovation.
In a press briefing after the meeting the Danish Minister expressed his optimism about reaching a Partial General Agreement by the end of May, while his Cypriot counterpart announced that during the second semester the Council would discuss the Rules for Participation, the Specific Programme and the role of Public Private Partnerships, which “will be one of the main pillars of the new policy”.
<link http://eu2012.dk/en/NewsList/Februar/Week-5/Compet-research - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>EC Measures Increase the Participation of SMEs in FP7</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/ec-measures-increase-participation-of-smes-in-fp7.html</link>
			<description>The European Commission introduced various measures in the FP7 Work Programmes 2012 to increase the participation of SMEs, such as ring-fencing a percentage of the budget of the ‘Thematic Priorities’ and introducing topics relevant for SMEs. These SME-friendly measures have been effective, according to a study published recently by the European Commission. From April to December 2011 the participation of SMEs increased from 14.4% to 15.3% (€2.4 billion) of the Cooperation budget –the data are extracted from the Grant Agreements signed by end December 2011-.
Link</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The European Commission introduced various measures in the FP7 Work Programmes 2012 to increase the participation of SMEs, such as ring-fencing a percentage of the budget of the ‘Thematic Priorities’ and introducing topics relevant for SMEs. These SME-friendly measures have been effective, according to a study published recently by the European Commission. From April to December 2011 the participation of SMEs increased from 14.4% to 15.3% (€2.4 billion) of the Cooperation budget –the data are extracted from the Grant Agreements signed by end December 2011-.
<link http://ec.europa.eu/research/sme-techweb/pdf/sme_participaton_in_fp7_2007_2011_full_report.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:08:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ERAC Meeting to Take Place in February </title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/erac-meeting-to-take-place-in-february.html</link>
			<description>On February 10th the European Research Area Council will organise its 9th meeting in Brussels. The meeting’s agenda will include a presentation by the Commission on the outcome of the ERA public consultation and the results of its impact assessment as well as a discussion on the links between ERA and Horizon 2020.Link</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 10th the European Research Area Council will organise its 9th meeting in Brussels. The meeting’s agenda will include a presentation by the Commission on the outcome of the ERA public consultation and the results of its impact assessment as well as a discussion on the links between ERA and Horizon 2020.<br /><br /><link http://www.era.gv.at/space/11442/directory/11587/doc/26032.html - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:04:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>EC Presents Results of the ERA Public Consultation</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/ec-present-results-of-the-era-public-consultation.html</link>
			<description>The results of the public consultation on the European Research Area Framework, launched last September, were revealed on January 30th at a conference in Brussels. The consultation report shows that while most of the respondents support the idea of creating ERA, they also believe that it will not be possible to complete it by 2014 as initially planned by the Commission. Respondents also called for strong political commitment to fight the bottlenecks that exist if Member States are to allow efficient researchers’ mobility, cross border cooperation, knowledge transfer, open access of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The results of the public consultation on the European Research Area Framework, launched last September, were revealed on&nbsp;January 30th at a conference in Brussels. <br /><br />The consultation report shows that while most of the respondents support the idea of creating ERA, they also believe that it will not be possible to complete it by 2014 as initially planned by the Commission. Respondents also called for strong political commitment to fight the bottlenecks that exist if Member States are to allow efficient researchers’ mobility, cross border cooperation, knowledge transfer, open access of public funded research and wide access of research infrastructures. <br /><br />Commissioner Geoghegan-Quinn stated in a&nbsp;rather tough speech that an “ERA Pact” would be signed with Member States and that&nbsp;these would be&nbsp;monitored&nbsp;annually, and if necessary “named and shamed&quot;, to ensure&nbsp;the&nbsp;ERA objectives are&nbsp;applied at national level. She continued by saying that &quot;if not enough progress is made until the&nbsp;end of 2013, I will advise my successor to take legal measures to implement the ERA”. In parallel, Robert-Jan Smits, Director General, DG Research,&nbsp;called on stakeholder associations to also commit to the prompt implementation of&nbsp;ERA. <br /><br />In June 2012&nbsp;the&nbsp;European Commission will present a non-legislative&nbsp;proposal for ERA.
<link http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/consultation/era-summary-reports_en.htm - external-link>Results consultation</link>
<link http://www.sciencebusiness.net/news/75630/Commission-launches-last-ditch-attempt-to-create-single-EU-market-for-research - external-link>Science|Business article</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The Council Rejects the GMES Being Outside the MFF</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/the-council-rejects-the-gmes-being-outside-the-mff.html</link>
			<description>The Council is preparing a strong set of conclusions regarding the proposed funding and governance model for the European Earth Monitoring Programme (GMES), which went unnoticed as they were presented by the Commission the same day as the Horizon 2020 proposals. The European Commission proposed to fund GMES through a fund external to the MFF and that would be made up by the proportional contributions from the Member States. In the draft conclusions, the European governments clearly reject this idea.
Previously, the EU contribution to the GMES programme came from the general budget and €670...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Council is preparing a strong set of conclusions regarding the proposed funding and governance model for the European Earth Monitoring Programme (GMES), which went unnoticed as they were presented by the Commission the same day as the Horizon 2020 proposals. The European Commission proposed to fund GMES through a fund external to the MFF and that would be made up by the proportional contributions from the Member States. In the draft conclusions, the European governments clearly reject this idea.
Previously, the EU contribution to the GMES programme came from the general budget and €670 million from FP7 went to fund GMES activities. GMES is already on its fully operational phase and therefore there won’t be any more R&amp;D activities related to it. This means that, even if it is to be reintroduced in the MFF, the money should not come from the €80 billion earmarked for Horizon 2020.
<link http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/st05/st05578.en12.pdf - external-link>Link</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:08:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Research Ministers to Discuss Horizon 2020 with Stakeholders</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/research-ministers-to-discuss-horizon-2020-with-stakeholders.html</link>
			<description>On 1st and 2nd February will take place the Ministerial Conference on Horizon H2020 in Copenhagen. The Commissioners and the Ministers from the 27 member states will have the opportunity to hear (briefly) the point of view of some of the stakeholders involved in Horizon 2020, who will present their opinion on each of the three pillars. On the 2nd, in the framework of the Informal Council meeting, Ministers will discuss three issues that are top on the agenda: synergies with other programmes, simplification measures and, luckily, how to bridge the gap between Research and Innovation. The...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On 1st and 2nd February will take place the Ministerial Conference on Horizon H2020 in Copenhagen. The Commissioners and the Ministers from the 27 member states will have the opportunity to hear (briefly) the point of view of some of the stakeholders involved in Horizon 2020, who will present their opinion on each of the three pillars. On the 2nd, in the framework of the Informal Council meeting, Ministers will discuss three issues that are top on the agenda: synergies with other programmes, simplification measures and, luckily, how to bridge the gap between Research and Innovation. The question is whether they will come up with&nbsp;original and concrete proposals that would be very welcomed at this stage.
<link http://www.era.gv.at/attach/ProgrammeMinisterialconferenceandinformalCouncilmeeting1-2February2012inCopenhagen.pdf - external-link>Agenda</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:24:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Debates on Horizon 2020 at the EP</title>
			<link>http://www.earto.eu/european-news/detail/article/first-debates-on-horizon-2020-at-the-ep.html</link>
			<description>On January 23rd the European Parliament’s ITRE Committee had its first exchange of views of the year with the European Commission on Horizon 2020.  The Committee, which is now under the chair of conservative Italian MEP Amalia Sartori, expressed its critical views on the “oversimplification “ - as a consequence of the unique funding model proposed by the Commission - and on the insufficient increase of the programme’s budget. Another key question raised included the need to focus the future programme in tackling societal challenges effectively, by funding only a limited number of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On January 23rd the European Parliament’s ITRE Committee had its first exchange of views of the year with the European Commission on Horizon 2020. <br />&nbsp;<br />The Committee, which is now under the chair of conservative Italian MEP Amalia Sartori, expressed its critical views on the “oversimplification “ - as a consequence of the unique funding model proposed by the Commission - and on the insufficient increase of the programme’s budget. Another key question raised included the need to focus the future programme in tackling societal challenges effectively, by funding only a limited number of value-added activities within each challenge. 
The ITRE Committee has also received the Danish Minister for Research, Innovation and Higher Education, Morten Østergaard, who explained the Presidency’s objective to achieve a general partial agreement on Horizon 2020’s governance by May whereas the Rules for Participation will be left for the second half of 2012.
]]></content:encoded>
			<category>European news</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:02:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
